Tektronix Technical Forums are maintained by community involvement. Feel free to post questions or respond to questions by other members. Should you require a time-sensitive answer, please contact your local Tektronix support center here.
I used Keithley electrometers 45 years ago when I was an undergrad and graduate student (involving the measurement of photomultiplier tube currents) and became fascinated by the metrology of low current measurement. In the late 60's I expressed my interest to the company, making it clear that I wasn't looking for job; just being very curious and interested. To my surprise I was invited to Cleveland to visit the facilities and talk with some engineers. At the end of the visit that day I was treated to a (brief) meeting with Dr. Joseph Keithly, company founder.
The, after nearly 40 years of teaching lighting engineering, I retired from the University of Colorado and returned to my interest in Keithley electrometers as a hobby. I have since collected most of the instruments in this field that Keithley made (eBay, UsedLine and so on), beginning with the model 200 and 210 electrometer voltmeters that Dr. Keithley first offered. So far I have, in all, 23 Keithley electrometers. Many I have refurbished (replacing vacuum tubes, electrolytic capacitors that have gone bad, old connectors, readjusting/recalibrating and so on. Some are now quite rare, some surprisingly common. I have a beautiful version of the 642 -- gate current ~ 3x10-17a, very low noise. An amazing instrument and one of the best things Keithley ever offered.
I very recently finally acquired two contollers and a measurement head that comprised the Keithley 640 vibrating capacitor electrometer. The do not behave. I have worked carefully with the manual, doing the various voltage adjustments and circuit checks listed -- those are in order. I suspect something is wrong with the DC amplifier in the controllers, but am not sure. Finally my question: is there anyone at Keithley who recalls enough about this instrument to provide some guidance? If not, can anyone make a recommendation for someone who has?
It is my hope and plan to establish an website to showcase these interesting hallmarks or metrological progress.
- Keithley Applications
- Posts: 2849
- Joined: June 10th, 2010, 6:22 am
- Country: United States
He is retired and still comes to the office a couple of days a week.
I will ask him to respond to your request on the Model 640.
Can't wait to see your site !
In Keithly's my vintage T&M collection I also have a few. My latest find is a pair of new 301's
The 301 was a Op Amp one could buy for integrating into ones own design.
What can we do to get your retired engineer to do something like the oral histories at
http://www.hpmemory.org/timeline/compan ... s_home.htm ?
-pete Ex Tek
Have you seen this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V7z5CQFg3U
It's a commemoration of the 60 years (60!) of service that Keithley engineer John Yeager
offered Keithley and the measurement industry. John was kind enough to contact me (with Dale's help)
about the 640 vibrating capacitor electrometer, after I made my initial posting. His memory allowed him
to provide a fascinating retelling of the story of its development. He also provided an explanation of why
it was on the market so briefly (relatively speaking).
We would like to do an article with you about your collection of Keithley instrumentation. Would you be willing to talk with us?
I've recently acquired a 640 electrometer and find the dc-ac modulation technique fascinating and would like to acquire a few of the Phillips xl7900 for study and experimentation..
I just saw your post about the old Keithley 640. I have never seen any source for the Phillips xl7900 vibrating capacitor. I had long been interested in it, though never had one until I managed to buy the complete 640 itself. Though I have acquired (virtually) all the literature available for the Phillips xl7900, I have never seen the device itself offered for sale. My impression was that it was quite fiddly. Via this forum I was put into contact with a long-retired engineer who worked at Keithley during and after the development of the 640. He said that there was considerable difficulty achieving *reliable* performance. He recalls that Keithly had to send one of its engineers to Phillips, spending several months there, working with the Phillips people to get a reliable physical setup and circuit perfected. It was his understanding (and my own historical research seems to verify the fact) that the xl7900 was never used in any other commercial equipment.
In fact, the retired Keithley engineer said that Phillips discontinued production of the xl7900 not long after Keithley instroducted the 640. I guess I'm not surprised. The market for such a thing would have minuscule, they were probably very expensive, and the development in high-sensitivity, high input resistance MOSFETs was very rapid. Most folks must have seen that MOSFETs would become a practical input device for electrometers. Indeed, Keithley's next electrometer was the 645, dual matched MOSFET based instrument.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests